Page 267 - Diện Mạo Và Triển Vọng Của Xã Hội Tri Thức

27. Neustadtl A. and Robinson J. R: “Social Contact
Differences Between Internet Users and Nonusers in the General
Social Survey”, IT&Society, 2002, 1(1), pp. 73-102.
28. Nie N.: Studyoĩthe Social Consequences oíthe Internet,
Staníord Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society (SIQSS),
2000, http://www.stanford.edu.
29. Nie N. and Erbring L.: Internet and Society: SIQSS
Internet Study, 2000 http://www.stanford.edu.
30. Nie N. H. and Erbring L.: “Internet and Society; A
Preliminary Report”, IT&Society, 2002, 1(1), pp. 275-283, http://
www.ITandSociety.org.
31. Pettigrew Pierre s.: “L’avenir du politique”, Poỉitique
étrangère, 2000, no. 2.
32. Pew Internet Report; “More Online, Doing More”, Pew
Research Center, May 10, 2001, http://www.pewinternet.org.
33. Qureshi, Sajda: “Why is the iníormation society
important to us? The World Summit on the Inlormation Society
in Tunis”, Information Technology for Development, 2006, vol.
12, issue 1, p 1-5, 5 p.

34. Roche Christophe: “From Inlormation Society to
Knowledge Society: The Ontology Issue”, AIP Coníerence
Proceedings, 2002, vol. 627, issue 1, p. 575, 6 p.
35. Scholte dan Aart: “Civil Society and Democratically
Accountable Global Governance”, Government and Opposition
Ltd, Blackwell Publishing, 9600 Garsington Road, Oxíord 0X4
2DQ, UK and 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA, 2004.
36. Selian Audrey N.: “The World Summit on the Iníormation
Society and Civil Society Participation”, The Iníormation Society,
2004, no. 20.

2 6 9